Sensation Experience

Home Electrolysis Hair Removal Systems, are they any good?

When I began to look at the art of electrolysis as a vocational career, I have run into several controversial marketing and sales issues regarding home systems that do not work as they are supposed to, and what discipline a person must possess to be able to treat themselves efficiently and expertly. I decided to put in my own views on this matters and focus on as many sides as possible to try and encompass all the issues.
Last summer of 2013, I heard about a small, battery-operated gismo called the One Touch Clean and Easy Deluxe Home Electrolysis system. This page explains about what the machine does. As a blind person, I discovered that no where on the manual or web site said that vision is required to use the product. I can say from experience t hat you can feel the areas you are treating. However, because the world consists mainly of light-dependent sighted individuals, it makes sense to use your vision more and pretend that visual deprivation will not make a difference. It does make a difference, because you can pay attention to detail using your tactile and auditory senses.
Another reason why home electrolysis is not recommended is because of lack of skill in the average consumer.

While this may be true in most cases, I believe that if a prospective professional electrologist were to be successful, they must first understand how the treatment works from a technical standpoint, and then develop good and safe operating habits. If they choose, they can treat themselves. However, in our society, self-image and integrity are important than the will to care for others. That’s why people do not have discipline to really learn the procedure. Ignorance and stupidity can make treatment more painful if not done properly. Again, this might be true, but this is because this person is not willing or motivated to taking the time to really do the job well.

Whilst self-treatment is an option, it can pose as a danger to the electrology profession because less people are paying to have it done for them, and the fact that people have more control over their pain threshold than if it were done professionally. Again, I think there needs to be a balance, such as using sensation transmission to bond the client and professional together via use of electrodes on the brain, or using nitrous oxide and oxygen to relax the client during the procedure. I often find myself listening to music and or an audiobook while I undergo the treatment, as it helps me concentrate more on those than on the stinging sensation I get each time. Again, electrologists who are capable of treating themselves are highly encouraged to join the electrology field so that they can pay back in ways money can’t do. Better yet, learn the family of endogenous opioids and learn how to create them naturally.

Five months later, I came across a system called the Vector Professional Electrolysis System Trademark, which uses an unknown load of voltage and current to destroy hair with tweezers and a conductivity gel. Or, at least that’s how it’s supposed to work. However, I’ve been checking on Hair Facts’s hair removal section and things to avoid. I should point out that the information is out of date, as this happened in 2001. A lot has changed since then.
I did some comparison between the Deluxe manual and Vector User Guide.

Here are a few examples.

Having said all that, there is a concern that the public does not clearly know how to distinguish fact from fiction or quackery.

Companies are so good at convincing people in making them believe that their products work well when they have not the proof, other than to make redundant statements throughout their web site. Let’s take this a little further.
As stated above, no scientists have studied these products. All companies had to do was put the United States Food and Drug Administration logo based on junk or sound science. As an alternative, we have become too dependent on the government, and as a conspiracy theorist, I believe the public is ignorant about how to overcome these issues. It is time for newer and more holistic measures to be taken. We should not be suing companies for things that they have no proof over. If you want to see proof, a scientific study must be conducted between a chemist, a physicist and an electrical engineer, along with professional and amateur electrologists to really make sure the product does work for all kinds of skins and hair contrasts. If not, scientists can use genetic modification to close the hair pores and change the skin type. That itself is another matter, as surgical hair removal is not yet being performed except for hair transplants.

In conclusion, I think it is up for the consumer to experiment which systems work well, even though they might be putting themselves at risk for injury. My best advice is to just be smart. If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, I’d be glad to address any concerns you may have. I may also update this post if I find more information that might be useful.

Exit mobile version