A Commentary on the -Isms that Surround the Books I’ve been Reading

This post was originally written on Sunday, 24 August 2013.
I was recently reading Lois Lowry’s Giver Quartet and I have read all the books by Lurlene McDaniel, and they have given me lots of information on futuristic societies that have chosen to inseminate species using artificial means, thereby inbreeding the species in an effort to control the genes involved. Everyone is colour-blind because of sameness, which means gender neutrality, and the use of colours are eliminated from their vocabulary. They also prevent people from making wrong choices, or the idea that one would make such a choice might never cross someone’s mind. People are assigned jobs based on the personality traits that they developed during their childhood. At a certain age, people have to take a special pill, which will neutralise emotions of sexual yearnings, extreme mood swings, and a few other emotions. These societies try to control global warming, over-population, vegetarianism, hunger and starvation, warfare, climate control, naming demographic groups, modifying evolutionary biology, exploring the endless possibilities of paranormal and supernatural phenomena, science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics (STEAM), brain wave interaction, manipulation synchronisation, the practice of passing down memories from generation to generation, and these manuscripts have nothing involving politics and governmental issues. They do not focus on building new societies on other planets, something NASA is considering. There is hardly any form of music involved, no mention of art and things like that. In literature these are known as either utopian or dystopian societies, though usually the latter. And, there are usually rebels who question authority. Although they might have a different system, they all try to focus on the same thing that was listed above, to keep the earth clean and to prevent human disaster. They also referred to pets as mammals because they do not have them in these communities, and they also have dialects, accents and cadences. This is because there may be outlying communities that are more primitive and are not quite civilised. It is said that these societies also alter child development and everyone is productive and no one is under or overweight. When they are done the community kills them, which is replaced with sensitive euphemisms. From “The Giver”
[“If you are currently experiencing high arousal and or desire for nurturing, you may want to consider starting treatment.”]
The pill used in this H+ society actually has a potential to temporarily stop the release of sex hormones, which, in turn, would lead to the suppression of testosterone, oestrogen, Oxytocin, among others that will neutralize one’s emotions. This is one of the things that is highly probable later in the future. I am somewhat opposed to the idea. But I am glad that the pill would only temporarily do the work, and not permanently.
Sometimes, I keep hold onto essays I have written throughout my education. You never know when they may become useful outside of the classroom. Below are a few that I would like to share.
Maintaining Immature Behaviour
What is the first thought that comes into a person’s mind when they think about or are confronted with rudeness or lack of etiquette? Maybe they feel they ought to teach that person a lesson. They may feel sorry for that person because they were not taught to use manners appropriately. Here are some examples which contribute to rudeness and why it exists, especially in our present-day society.
To begin with, rudeness is a perception, a morale taught by elders. This is what is believed to be right or wrong, and this may change from culture to culture in different countries. Rudeness is what we as humans understand based on the laws of nature. It calls for many kinds of gestures, sayings, body language which anyone can do, but it will take the perception and interpretation of another human to know what that gesture means.
The way children grow up learning from others is a concept parents know as being observant, but they may not know what they are learning. This includes picking up creative ideas or developing nasty habits. Yet children fail to comprehend what is right or wrong. For instance, if they see someone being rude to someone else they naturally assume it is all right to do that. This may lead to trouble down the road as will be emphasised below.
Due to the increase of instability and the falling of humanity over the turn of the twenty- first century, many people, mainly teenagers act in an immature manner to show that they do not care in one way or another what life means to them. Their main interest is in themselves, which is the primary belief in human nature. All the things most Americans do in society, the music they listen to, the technology they use, and their social engagements they partake of, all have a form of impact in what they do or say.
A good example of sheer rudeness one can take into account is the fact that a person not be too particular about a fellow’s writing style on the internet, yet some people act impulsively as it may be a habit for some to correct others on an informal setting. It is suggested that a person should always tell the other person that it is a good way to exercise their writing skills for when the time comes, such as filling out a job application or writing a resume. Instead of having to start an argument over deciding whether correcting other’s spelling is rude or not, it should be discussed to determine if there was any reason for having that take place.
When a person is confronted with such a situation, it should be up to that person who initially started this argument to make that decision. Is it rude to correct other’s spelling? It depends on the circumstances that surround this situation, for this is one example which is hard to solve because there are two sides to the problem. However, this is no excuse for everyone to behave so childlike and jump to conclusions. It should be talked out in a tranquil manner.
Another example which follows in the same lines is how a person addresses others with words and emotions. When a question is asked in the politest manner and the person being asked, turns it down with a rude insult, it is more than one can handle. Are they aware that they have insulted the person and acted so uncivilised? That answer is hard to say because some people are rude by nature, as explained above.
While maintaining proper manners may be difficult, I always try to keep things calm, though sometimes I may do something I might regret later. I feel this is mainly due to the fact that I am treated as someone who is too smart for them to bear, someone they would rather not be with. Our society may never be perfect, but there is nothing wrong in pursuing it, and that is what I try to do in my life, but it is not easy. Rudeness is an ever-lasting trend with any doubt that it will stop. When a person thinks of rudeness, they should think about why is it that it exists. They should not focus on the fact that it exists, but think about WHY it is present.
For all ninth graders facing their last four years of required education: You are lucky to have such a wide variety of choices that may make your high school experience run more smoothly and with ease. You might be the typical average student, or you could have something unique about you. Whatever it is, I want you to know that there is one thing I believe you should get out of your high school experience.
Maybe you enjoy modern society, and the latest music hits, as well as the newest fashions and literature. If you think twice about it, you will realize schools want to teach you the history of how things came to be. In music, you are apt to hear bands playing music from the classical romantic or jazz era. In English, you may look at literary classic, since they contain a higher complexity than the newer novels. My point is that you should appreciate history. It may seem boring, but if you are interested as how we came to be, how we moved from era to era, how we formed our American society and the conflicts that were involved, and how we solved them, then history is for you.
In my opinion, real music is music with high complexity, and so as the English language, when spoken or written formally, for this is how people wrote and spoke in the early days. I have a reason to suspect that maybe some of the new things may seem overwhelming, and I try to keep it simple.
Here is an English lesson for you. You may be used to texting a lot on your mobile telephone that you start using it as a habit in a number of applications. If you want to type assignments, then you should learn how to spell, regardless of whether or not you are writing an essay.
Now, let us look at some social involvements in high school. If you are popular, you will most likely be in all the school-sponsored activities. If you are a loner, try to get involved in some activities. Maybe you might not be popular in your first year of high school, but you will in a few years. Making friends in high school is not at all like making friends in elementary school. For one thing, you will share a good many thoughts with each other. Friends tend to share things they have in common, and this is what makes bonds stronger.
Also, you should know what your THING is. What I mean is some students realize this is what they want to pursue later in life, whether that would be art, theatre, music, photography, or the like. You might be a sports person, involved in football, British football (soccer), volleyball, and more.
When you go to a football game, it is more than just playing the game to see who wins. It is how you work together as one student body to help the players perform well on the field. You should realize how stupendous it is, that high school can pass by quickly. If you have a well- organised schedule, you know what your strategies are to getting your work done, you can move fairly quickly. What makes time seem to run slowly is due to stress. You may face stress when you are given a boatload of work.
There is so much we can do to accomplish on this earth, but it is up to us as a human race to do it. Are you interested in science soma, or psyche psychology? Maybe that is why you want to know more than just the concepts. The important thing is that you should know yourself and know who you are and what you need. If you do not know much about yourself, how can you tell others about your interests, needs, wants, weaknesses, etc?
Please give my advice a good amount of consideration, and if you follow it, you might change your mind about how you feel towards high school. I know it can be scary at first, but it will all come out nicely in the end, as it had for me.
Long before music developed in the western part of the world, before churches, cathedrals, palaces and universities were built, people had no way of establishing music, save for the wooden instruments and the metal materials they used, such as strings. These instruments could be played by wind, by striking them, or by plucking and bowing them. Many of those types remain in existence today, especially in more uncivilised parts of the world. People also used throat singing and overtone singing with their vocals later in this period before the middle ages. Mythology was a very important factor in music creation, and this was the reason why it was important.
In the medieval period, a lot of composers wrote music for the kings, the churches like the Roman Catholic. Their society was built based on how fairytales are built today as we know them. Peasants, knights, a royal family, etc. People wrote music in monophonic texture, which was meant to be used for worship in the church. Note: People did start to work with two-note harmony later in the period, and one of the rules for the church was not to use dissonant or tritonal intervals, nor could one write scales improperly. A cadence was also formed for the church, which is a very simple chord progression from four to one.
In the renaissance era, two instruments were introduced, the Haut and Bas. At that time a person could only play in one key at a time. Their writing standard was different. People started experimenting with humour and secular music, not just sacred music. There were different genres for each era. People started to experiment more with homophonic textures, especially with vocal music, but it was still not enriched. Certain roles, such as women, were not allowed to compose or practice music until later in each period. Also in the renaissance period, it resembled the age of reason, but in the rebirth, people began to focus on humanism and society, not on superstition and religion. Their visual art also reflected these changes. Making music at home became more popular, and children began to learn to make music, and each home now had a keyboard of some kind. Women started to perform music as well as pursue musical careers.
In the baroque era, the string orchestra was introduced, along with the harpsichord and old-fashioned pipe organ. IN America, the reed organ or harmonium was introduced later, before the invention of electricity. They all had little control over dynamics. In the baroque era, their texture was mainly polyphonic rounds, and it was made to be very dramatic. They seldom had melodic tunes. It was ornate, and they represented the Catholic counterreformation. They felt they should express the history of the past through operas, oratorios, and instrumental music. Pipe organs were used as prelude, in-service, and postlude music. The organ could provide a bass-line foundation to step beyond vocal registers of the congregation, and enrich the quality of chords. They had some form, just like everything has a form, as well as with every culture, there is a belief.
Their visual art was similar to what we see in expressionistic music, but its style was more of history rather than modern events. Bach was the transitional composer between this period and the next. Vocal music became more solitary rather than combined, hence the operas and oratorios. A new system of tuning that made it possible to play in any of the twelve notes was formed, calling it the equal temperament.
In the classical period, Haydn and Mozart were two of the most popular composers. In the classical era, the pianoforte was introduced, a simple but flexible instrument. Due to this, the orchestra began to grow because of the increase in dynamics. They experimented with emotions and mood contrasts. Homophonic textures were also becoming more commonplace. The most popular was the symphony,. And from that point on, people broadened to solo instruments or small ensembles. They would take tuneful melodies from old folk songs and turn them into actual pieces. There were four movements in a symphony, and each movement had its own musical form and structure. The main influence of the classical period was on the upper echelons, but Beethoven began to rebel against this, and soon, he started working for everybody. In a minuet, a person had to know the right steps, or else they would be considered a person of a middle or lower class. Everything had a social class back then. There were no life styles like we have now. Haydn was known for writing music for his master, which we would now know as an employer. Mozart wrote creatively, and this is where Beethoven picked up his ideas from. Their style was very clean and prophetic and well-organised, and so were their visual art.
When Beethoven began to rebel against the rules of the classical period, he became the transitional figure between the classical and romantic era. He wrote several pieces that contained chords, which might be considered dissonant in one time period, but consonant in another, or vice versa. He was very clever with his musical ideas, and one of his huge motifs is the three-note piece.
During these developments in Europe, The Americas used some of these principles to apply in their military marches, especially towards the middle of the nineteenth century. They experimented with bugle calls and drum patterns as more instruments were being developed. Many of these tunes would end up being used today, for as the saying states, everything derives from something else.
In the romantic period, we began to see people writing music based on real experiences, to express the unknown and the mysterious. And this was the age of reason because people were not just thinking about religion, but about science and fiction, strange places and foreign lands, based on impressionism and expressionism, which took place later towards the late 1800s. It was not just for the aristocrats or church members, but it was becoming a lot more popular. People began to write nationalistic music from all over Europe, and even the Eastern part of the world had some influence. The wars we fought in, the civil wars we partook of, the industrial revolution, the inventing of the telegraph and the telephone had a big influence on music experimentation. Another piano was introduced, thus giving it a more variety of ranges in dynamics and registers. The orchestra grew once more, and composers continued to experiment with tone colours and harmonies to simulate the sounds of scenes, nature, characters and such, along with the emotions and moods. The programmatic music was introduced. Today, we listen to programmatic music; most people just do not know about it. An example would be when someone watches Starwars, or something along the same line. The music portrays scenes of characters and their intellectual role in the movie, the same way we would expect in musical theatre, which will be discussed later. Suffice it to say that the symphonic and theatre organs were introduced to accompany silent movies. They were also used to replace orchestras in the early part of the twentieth century. The tone poem is a one-movement piece that has all of the emotions in one place. The ballet was introduced, and composers wrote music for the dances. So this is not just about nationalism and political influences, but about the identity of the piece. If someone recognises a piece from Chopin, no matter what it is he wrote, they would immediately know that it was he because of his unique signature. Their visual art was also influenced, and people used some of these characteristics that would later be used in the impressionistic and expressionistic serial movement.
Finally, all of this led up to the 1900s and 1940s. In here, the musicians took all that had happened and started to simplify the form of music into one-movement symphonies. Marches became more known. More instruments were made. Although composers collaborated with poets and writers, this still continued into the twentieth century. We had a lot more operas and choral pieces, and the orchestra grew once more, up to a hundred musicians now. In this time period, they still clung onto the romantic era because the fact that so many possibilities and ways to express real-life experiences through music and evoke scenes and moods was fascinating. Alexander Scriabin was the first composer to use synaesthetic principles to describe how he saw colours with sounds. Note that there were also some reports from Beethoven and Mozart about how they liked certain keys, since their emotions related to certain keys. The colour organ was introduced. Need I mention that besides impressionism, expressionism, nationalism, symbolism, serialism, and a few other artistic movements? This was the pinnacle in time that people reflected on those movements. The neoclassical styles were used Synonymously to repel against impressionism and expressionism. Also, a lot of people liked the clean feel of predictable style, rather than the dream-like feel, or the unconventional form of music experimentation that we witnessed in the music from the romantic and impressionistic period.
Prior to the style of Jazz music in America, a homophonic parallel style of music called barbershop quartet was introduced, and it quickly gained popularity. This style of music involves four singers, usually four people of the same gender, to sing lead, tenor, bass, and baritone. This can be classified as TTBB, the same way choral pieces are sung in SATB. If sung properly, the singers can make really beautiful chord progressions that enriches the tone quality immensely. This is almost the same way that ballads are built in England that we recognise today. For this reason, barbershop singing was often used in romance songs. Today, we now have the Barbershop Harmony society in the United States to maintain this wonderful style of art. It is common to hear them singing on Valentine’s day in America, and a few other parts of the world on certain occasions.
This century was known as the golden age. As we progress, huge changes occurred in ways that were outside of music. This gave people new avenues to experiment. Music language started to change, along with the composition system, and how music notation was being presented. Everything became atonal and unconventional, as opposed to being tonal and central. More music vocabulary was introduced and expanded. People began to experiment with these musical elements to get unconventional effects out of wood-wind, brass-wind, reed-wind, string, keyboard and percussion instruments. They went as far as using everyday objects to make music with, and they also went as far as making melodies based on patriotic tunes and random notes, to make variations that would be layered in different keys simultaneously, along with building new chords and chord progressions never thought of before. The common chord progression we now have today is the five to one, which began as early as the late classical period.
In the 1920s, after the success of the twelve-tone system and the palindrome arch-style composition, major influences of music in the Americas played a role in the development of Jazz. It consisted of multi-cultural influences, the Christian church, the blues scale, and the swinging type of rhythm that derived from ragtime, and that is how Jazz was formed. The texture became more homophonic and more catchier, rather than dramatic or moody. Jazz required only three main elements of music. Improvisation, syncopation, and blues. People had no name for this type of music, but the word Jass was a slang for high spirits, and it was first used throughout the turn of the century. When big band music became popular in the 1920s, teenagers were the first to notice the bands, and they would often dance to these popular tunes. It was the kind of music parents would not want their kids to be exposed to. More on this will be discussed later on.
Musical theatre was introduced later in this time period. People began to write music for musicals, or adapt them from books, and depending on the scene, they chose what kind of music they should write. The saxophones were introduced some time later, and this became popular in Jazz music, since it was all about manipulating the timbre of the instruments. This was part of the roaring twenties. Bands would compete against one another, and this is how we ended up with the battle of the bands. George Gershwin was one of the most widely recognised American composers of the twentieth century, among others.
In the early thirties, the great depression led to changes in music, and Jazz was a big hit that decade. It was known as pop music back then. Frank Sinatra was one of the popular stars in America’s classical swing period, and big bands were up to its zenith. Later, this declined due to an introduction of bebop, cool jazz and hardbop. Each variation was introduced to reflect the true meaning of the art, and to provide different meanings of each genre.
In the 1940s, people began to work with old folk songs and rewrite them into Jazz music of many variations, which somewhat reflects early versions of country music. Technology was starting to rise slowly, but it would not start soaring until the success with the atomic bombs in the United States. The labelling of recordings was being worked on, and since then, we now have albums, labels and liner notes, singles, and multi-tracking. European music used a different form of organisation to catalogue composer’s works of music. People who wrote an entire musical piece, and who performed them are referred to as artists, rather than composers or lyricists.
After the second world war and the cold war, known as the 1945 and up to the present, technology started rising at a tremendous rate before our very years. Now that we had the radio invented, and a lot of autos travelling freeways, as well as planes flying overhead, music could be carried anywhere around the world. The television would not be ready until after the 1950s. Someone decided to turn the guitar into an electric instrument, and they discovered that they could make a whole lot of noise. The wax cylinders were replaced with vinyl records and analogue tapes. Composers started to sample tapes by splicing and storing them away. They contained real-life sounds, such as car horns, birds chirping, etc. Rock-N-Roll was introduced in the 1950s after this major breakthrough. Another practice that artists started to employ was something called back-masking, backward masking, or phonetic and speech reversal phenomena to hide messages and such into their music for various reasons. Someone found two analogue generators, one for tones and another for noise. They were able to experiment with making electronic soundscapes and vowel changes to make it sound as if voices were talking.
The stereotyping of musical instruments and other things began to take place, just like any other movement affected by how people were classified into groups of the social mainstream. Later in this century people started to reflect and go beyond these assumptions that led up to further movements. That was what was important about social classes back then, which we still have today. We would see later throughout with this style of unconventional music that it would become popular to youth culture because they like to experiment, and find out what happens in the end. Unfortunately, people who do not grow out of it tend to develop nasty habits that may lead them into trouble, such as taking drugs and committing crime. Many musicians took different drugs to experiment with vocal tone colour, which we know is not good, but that is what they got anyhow.
From then on, the experimenting with manipulating electronic analogue sounds to get different tone colours continued, one good example is the Hammond organ, which could be used to play in certain styles of popular music. These became more appealing, especially with the rebuilding of the rhythm section. More electronic instruments were made, and when computers became more known, along with synthesisers, the frequency-modulated digital synthesiser was the first. We now had stereo channel, and everything was binary, octal and hexadecimal. We now have digital audio generation. New genres were made based on these influences abroad, and up until today, a lot of that remains. Technology makes it very easy for the average person to make music, without having any prior experience in music training. This is one reason musical form lacks a great deal. Also, music can change over night all around the world, just by one single click of that mouse.
A link I found in correspondence to performing and visual art was the form of literary art. Based on experimental trials, I discovered that people who have a passion for artistic and older music tend to be more proper than those who are into popular music. It is suspected that this has to do with the complexity of both performing, visual and literary art, as opposed to simplistic art.
Scientists are looking into the evolution of music, how it affects the brain, and how rhythms evolved over time. It is believed that it originates from primitive senses. The new age music was introduced in the latter half of the twentieth century, and people are working on understanding how certain sounds, timbres and keys have an emotional effect, such as what Christian Schubert described in 1806.
Additional notes: With each time period, the duration between each era became shorter and shorter. Back then, each era lasted for about a hundred years. Today, it is almost over night.
Although a lot of elements of music were used in each period, not much has changed in vocal music until later in the music history. Musical form changed as well.
Now that we know how music really works, it can be seen as an organised structure of sound in time, with ten or more main elements of music we use, no matter what style, where we are in the time frame, or if we are in the west or east of the world. Sacred music refers to music for the church, and a lot of arrangers exist today to experiment with timbre and harmonisation. Secular music refers to music about the world, adventure, love, romance, etc. Artistic music refers to music that has been well-made and properly structured. Popular music is music made without organisation, which also has a wide appeal to audiences at large because of how they react to it, and normally remains so for a few years before something new comes along.
In conclusion, sacred versus secular, and art versus popular music are the two contrasts people should know. So when they hear someone use the word classical, they usually think about music made in general terms, which require artistic creativity, and not so much about the era. Therefore, I like to use the word artistic secular, or artistic sacred. I might also refer to it as Western Art music.
Modern Christian music consists of worship bands playing popular sacred music because it uses electronic instruments and form instead of acoustic instruments and form.
That is why we have people like John Williams, Jackie Evancho, and a few others who like to turn popular music into artistic or cross-over music to broaden the number of audience appeal. So when I tell someone about how I dislike the music they listen to, I would not mind listening to it if it had been fitted and stylised for my particular taste. For this reason, I am easily isolated from the social medium.
Thank you for taking the time to read through this and don’t forget to listen to the extra media about mechanical speech. Remember that everything stated in this entry has exceptions, can be contradicted and I may forget something. Also, I give my advice and opinions based on personal experience. I am not an omniscient expert–though I’d like to be.
In the next post I will go over some of my favourite memories of me flying on a plane. I may also discuss synaesthesia and cellular memory in greater detail, as well as some of my sensory experiences and my observations. My hope is that we will soon unlock all of nature’s secrets.

Sensory Substitution and Augmentation

This post was originally written on Sunday, 24 August 2013.
A question I have for the blind community at large is: Many of the sighted people wonder if blind people can see in their dream. The answer depends on how much development is active in their visual cortex. If, on the other hand, there is no development, then that person would not be able to dream vision because it would not be able to associate what vision is when they wake up.
If you, having an early visual deprivation, that is to say, vision for an extremely short amount of time had developed vision during your subconscious stage when you think of everything as dreams, and disembodied memories from when you were two, then you suddenly lose your vision when you are three, then your brain would have had some development but not a lot. Due to this, people have excellent spacial awareness through tactile, auditory, and vestibular stimulation. Plus, they have superior memories. So it makes it easier for a person to rewire their brains to become a synaesthete, and also the genetic influence of the brain’s processing speed and neuroplasticity rates would have to be considered as a possible factor. So is it possible to extract these hidden images from the subconscious and bring them into the conscious by use of brain wave entrainment sessions like hypnotism? Can we make you, having low vision for almost all of your life dream that you have perfect vision?
People are already trying to unlock the secret of people’s minds by listening to their reversed speech (David John Oates), so if we can do that then we can find out more. This part might sound more like pseudoscience.
To be able to hear colour, one must have a way- above-average musical aptitude and perfect pitch perception. A question is, is pitch perception universal? We know that tastebud mapping is not universal. So how do we know that what light looks like to one person might look different to another? Same with sound.
When it comes to choosing to use a cochlear implant, it will remain with you for life. If one wore the implant and a few years later a medical breakthrough found ways to regenerate cochlear hair cells, the rig would have to be destroyed, and there would be the risk of accidental nerve damage, which might cause one to lose taste, balance and other vital senses and motor abilities for a short while.
It is easy for a person to be implanted at an extremely early age than it is for an adult. This is because the implant produces distorted sounds that have little colour and are mainly in grey scale noise variety. What I would like to propose is a new rehabilitation system that would allow users to wear a simulated implant, and they would use it in real-life situations and would understand about all of its uses. If they are happy with the switch it would make the process easier.
I am a humanist and believe it is up to the person to decide based on their morale and not their superstition. There are so many things one can appreciate without having to go through invasive surgery to be able to see or hear, if that is their wish. Some people think blindness as being a good thing because they use their other senses to really grasp onto concepts sighted people cannot grasp. Some people believe that having a condition such as blindness is a bad thing because no matter how much we try to make the world accessible, there are always going to be problems. Some feel ambivalent, meaning they are neutral. This is because we are taught how to see as our primary sense, therefore we have not rewired our brains to combine the three most vital senses, sight, sound, and touch into one whole.
We should raise awareness about the need to think twice about what we have done throughout humanity, and realise there could be more. While I do not believe in using cybernetic compounds and using advanced technology and prefer to older things, I have faith in the medical science system that it can be done, such as regenerative medicine and gene therapy. This is because I am pursuing a career that a lot of blind people usually do not pursue; they usually work on information and computer technology, engineering in audio-related fields and things like that.
So, this is open to anyone who wants to make their voice heard about the need for improvement in the human race.

Transgender Issues and Problems in Western Culture

This post was originally written on Sunday, 24 August 2013.
Transgender Issues and Problems in Western Culture
Hello everyone, today I would like to follow up on what I did this week before I dive into some of the other stuff I promised I would do last week.
Let’s start out with what I have been doing in the GLBTQIA and H+ communities. I dove deeper into how the brain works into greater detail. Through recent research I learned that the left brain is known as either the masculine or scientific brain while the right brain is known as the feminine or artistic brain. I did some research that some of the sexist assumptions do have scientific evidence to back them up. One says that males have a lot more blood flow on the left side of the brain than on the right, and that they only have language input and integration on the left as well. They experience pain on the right side of the amygdala which controls external functions. When they encounter stress, their fight-or-flight responses are active. Males are more likely to contract any form of language and motor disabilities. This is why many find it dissonant to be more feminine. But of course, if you were a bridge brainer it would not matter.
Females have a larger corpus callosum, have blood flow primarily on the right side of the brain and has access to both left and right sides for language integration and fine motor skills. They experience pain on the left side of the amygdala, which controls internal functions. Females are more likely to experience problems related to emotions and moods. Stress is controlled by the rest-and-repair part of the central nervous system. This is another possibility why females find it easy for them to be like males. Source: http://nurturingparenting.com/images/cmsfiles/maleandfemalebrainfunctioning2-23-2012-r3.pptx http://www.webmd.com/balance/features/how-male-female-brains-differ?page=3
Now, what is nature and what is nurture? Are morals and ethics given to us at birth or through learning? To be able to express the morals and ethics you need nurture to learn the language, but to actually carry out the decision that will not require language and therefore would be considered nature. So, back to the way boys and girls grow up, female babies are able to learn how to talk much earlier than male babies. Girls are better at language and fine motor skills than boys until puberty. Boys are bettr at mathematics and geometry than girls. Women are better multitaskers and observers than men. Men are better at spacial mapping than women. Using these characteristics, I would like to propose a new finding for people who might be transgender. If a male-to-female baby learned to talk at a much earlier age than their sibling, and was better at everything than their fellow students, and they were an excellent multitasker and observer, then they would most likely be transgendered. The question then becomes, how will they be aware of the fact. You see, because of my disabilities, it took me so long to find out that I was a very special person. Imagine the parrotfish for a minute. I read this n a book called Parrotfish by Ellen Witlinger. Think about the females turning into supermales. What if the male-to-female human became a superfemale? A lot of the studies I noticed about the causes of this was primarily due to genetics and mistreatment of the foetus. But I want to look into other factors, such as the ones I already described. And, of course, for the female-to-male person, they have the characteristics of a male’s brain but is inside a female body. Male-to-female people find it a lot harder to come out than female-to-male people. When they are exposed to the outside world, the orientation that they would most likely be attracted to is dependent on how their brains are wired. For example, a stereotype says that gay men are feminine. This means that they like other men from a woman’s point of view, but not from a man’s. Same thing with lesbians. Another interesting thing that can also be observed is instead of a man being attracted to a woman, he would envy her body image because he wants to break out of his own body and experience the other body. I also dove more into the lavender linguistics that GLBTQIA people used, like the vocal fry, the gay lisp, the valley dialect, and the way they did these things in certain situations.
I was intrigued by a hypothesis of the Mozart effect, and this kind of ties into the reading people do. Truth is, the more you are a bookworm, the more knowledgeable you are to be, and the more you listen to Western art music, the smarter you are going to be. So if you combine the two, your brain will slowly rewire. This might be one of those induced patterns that is apart from the innate identity and is considered another possibility. Also, in modern times, more and more single mothers are raising their children, male children especially, therefore feminising them. This suggest that in future generations everyone will be feminised. I am not sure what masculinists are saying about this shift. Masculism has ruled too long in the animal kingdom that feminism or egalitarianism should be given a turn. It is also observed that people respond better to female appearance and vocal ability, something that humans want to see in robots later in the future. This is why a lot of gagets have female voices. Babies have shown that they can start developing recognition to their mother’s voices long before they are born. They will and only will respond to that voice than any other voice.
People assume that watching television, reading commics and playign video games etc, rots the brain. The thing is, it is not the act of doing those things, but it is WHAT you DO that does it. For instance, if you watched very educational programmes and played very educational video games, then your brain would learn and wire to a more average extent. However, science has shown that playing violent video games boosts fight-or-flight responses in the central nervous system. So, there can be a little bit of violence, but it should not be carried to the extent that it will wire the brain to make a person so selfish and greedy. Gaming allows one to strategise and build maps in their minds to improve spacial abilities and improve photographic and or eidetic memory.
Now, let’s move on to how we can patch up these differences. If you read the above sources you may have surmised that we are gradually forcing our children’s brains to rewire so that both become harmonised than what was found in evolutionary history. This is one of the reasons postgenderism is occurring. I recently came across some possible theories for the future, one of which got my interest. The ability to regrow a human body and perform a brain transplant or organ harvesting to keep the mind and soul alive is known as replacement cloning. This is almost like immortality, to be able to live forever. This would cure tons of disabilities out there if it proved to work out in practice. This would be added to the possibility of stem cell therapy, which might replace plastic surgery. And, of course, mind-veering will be very important. Only LGBTQIA scientists would think about cloning themselves to get the right bodies so they could dwell in them. So, why is it a big deal to be able to change who you are. People change political views, changed career goals, religion, etc. Why is gender switching such a big deal? After all, if some species can do it, why can’t humans? I know people tell you to accept your body for what it is. But, if you really hate the way your body turned out to be, then you should have the right to change it to how you view yourself and how you expect others to see you.
I also got involved with a new voice machine called the Tokyo artificial larynx. It is a brass instrument that you blow into, and the rubber vocal folds vibrate to produce a tone. Currently a stoma is required to blow into it and talk at the same time. I am ooking to see if a billow and or a pump could be made for it so that other people can use it, too. I looked into the relationship between hearing and speaking, and how words have become more and more pejorative in our Western world because of increase in diversity. When you use the words mute or dumb, people assume you are not willing to speak. Truth is, language depends on the ears to hear and the voice to produce. Input, integration, and output. So what I wanted to figure out was, how can we experience different forms of speech impediments, especially the ones relating to integration? What is it like to be able to babble but not speak intelligently? What is it like for someone to know what they want to say but not be able to say it? Those who have had strokes and had their brains erased and formatted, therefore they would need to have their brains rewired. Also, people with tracheostomies cannot speak because the air would be flowing on the bottom of the voice box, not the top. People without vocal folds CANNOT whisper. Someone has suggested that a person is voiceless, not speechless. You can learn a lot more about this, and you will even get to see if helium has an effect on the artificial voice. You can check out this person’s YouTube channel at http://www.youtube.com/user/QuietBob97 And with that, I will talk about some of the things I have explored that has made me the person I am now.

The Musical Makeover

This post was originally written on Sunday, 18 August 2013.
This project was started to help blind and visually-impaired people to understand the art of makeup and other attire culturally associated with femininity using sound. We use a variety of computer technology and holophonic and holographic algorithms with the most advanced characteristics in the physics of sound and light to date and apply a relationship to science and emotion. One concept we examine is qualia, the state of overall conscience in a human being when exposed to the redness of twilight. Until the transhumanism community finds a way to stimulate the visual cortex, this is all that we currently have to help blind people understand how attractive they really look using sound. Put these in mind. Colour equals tones, and shades and tints are noise. There will be a whole lot more, and current sounds will only show you the patterns of light that will be converted. A completely different algorithm can take the shape of the image and turn it into a soundscape for a blind person to interpret. One question I would want to keep in mind is, how and why do male and female skin contrasts and other characteristics differ? Is it because of hormones, race, etc? Many people use the words ethnicity and race the same way they use the words sex and gender. The former can be compared to race while the latter can be related to ethnicity.
Before we begin, let us start out with the concepts and history of cosmetics. First of all, what is makeup? Makeup is a type of practice that involves the use of pigments that are applied to parts of the body to modify a wavelength of light reflection, apart from the skin’s natural colour, which ranges from dark to light types of ROY. Some of the other options in cosmetology such as hair styles, jewlry, etc may not need a lot of training such as makeup because blind people will be able to feel them. Hair dying is a different matter and may require some training with the Musical Makeover to understand this better.
What is the purpose of makeup and why has it existed? Makeup is a way of modifying a wavelength of light on the surface of the skin or other part of the body to enhance their attractivity to other members. It is like someone shows you a list of harmonic-based music, and you have to choose which one you found most attractive. Science has actually demonstrated that the use of makeup throughout history has aided in gaining more attraction. However, as things advanced, we invented chemicals with pigments in them that were easy to apply and could be put in a variety of different forms and shapes.
Here’s a textbook example of makeup and jewellry and other forms of maximum differentiation. I didn’t learn the real reason high heels were invented, but after doing a little bit of digging, I discovered that they lifted a person’s heels to make it look as though said person was having an orgasm. Likewise, makeup made one look as if someone were constantly flushing. I guess that’s why a lot of double-standards dictate that when a woman is aroused, she can get away with it because there is no visible external signs the way there would be if a man were aroused.
Now, you might be wondering, why do we use music? First of all, let me explain what music is. Music consiss of organised time and sound. But this is not the case with colours. Colour is a pattern of light (a set of frequencies) that can evoke specific emotions and moods. In sound, however, this changes slightly. While we have been able to transpose light frequencies directly to sound frequencies, musical keys of all sorts, including intervals have shown to evoke emotion rather than single-pitched notes such as in the rainbow piano technique. Suppose we could treat this art as we would colour. This means that the musical makeover would only consist of chords that move in random accordance to what was being displayed on the camera or mirror screen. In other words, no rhythm or organised stuff.
Now that you have learned about musical makeover, it is time for us to start spreading the word about this wonderful possibility to concentrate not only on the obvious, but start to see beyond expectations. Below are a list of sources that explain some of the work being done in this field.
Adam Montandon’s Official Website: http://www.adammontandon.com/neil-harbisson-the-cyborg/
Cyborg Foundation: http://www.cyborgfoundation.com/
Neil Harbisson – I listen to Colour: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygRNoieAnzI
The Human Eyeborg : Neil Harbisson at Gateway: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_mmwrbDGac
Neil Harbisson – the Cyborg who hears Colour: http:/HYPERLINK “http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO_P2EYnu7c”/www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO_P2EYnu7c
And finally, the Colour of Sound – Documentary, a video describing the strong links between the two overlapping senses using synaesthesia: http://www.youtubeHYPERLINK “http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj4MOOCFspk”.com/watch?v=cj4MOOCFspk
Emotions of the musical keys by Christian Schubart: http://www.wmich.edu/mus-theo/courses/keys.htm
http://www.color-wheel-pro.com/coHYPERLINK “http://www.color-wheel-pro.com/color-meaning.html”lor-meaning.html
Please note: Everything stated in this entry always has exceptions, can be easily contradicted, and I may forget to add something important long after this post has been published. Please remember to let me know if any of these links are broken. In the next post I will cover some of the reasons I am opposed to popular culture such as music. Just to make things clear. I do my best not to let my work consume my life and to throw myself one hundred percent into anything that I am exposed to. Usually I might get so involved for the first few bits of the thing that I am working on before it starts to balance out and something new comes along. I do not fall under the typical blind stereotypes because I want to take in everything life has to offer.

Oblivion in Humankind

Hello again and welcome to my second post about what I do and how I do things. Today I will be covering some topics that I have explored and wondered. But before I dive into that, let me just give you a reminder that although I generally come up with very wild scientific ideas, I want to keep them all within human boundaries so that I do not pose as a risk to anyone, like erasing someone’s memory or killing someone, etc. Sometimes we just get so obsessed. That is why we work with models first, animals second, and then we finally hold clinical trials. So with that, I will go ahead and start.
So over the last few months I was noticing that our economy was becoming more and more competitive, and I had known this fact for a while now, but I began to research this further. When our country was first founded, it was decided to start off using the philosophy of John Locke, that we all want to abide by the laws of nature. When our financial system was built, it was obvious that we were going to be capitalists. However, this turned out to influence things in the future. Our founders knew that technology would change the future, so we became very flexible. Now, in our modern society, we have people who commit financial crimes and manipulate people just for their money. Now, what is the purpose of money? In scripture, it is stated that one who works will be one to earn a reward. If money did not exist, people would not become motivated to be a full contributer to society. Money and religion has had a history more than government and religion. This is one of the many reasons why we are not keeping up to standards in research. In Europe and other places, they are ahead, especially in things like free healthcare, and better welfare for people who are unable to contribute for one reason or another. So I think we should find a way to balance this out further.
A little more on professionalism: Why is it that we as professionals have low expectations from our clients that we generally have a negative attitude towards others? Because we are afraid of becoming too personally involved with them. One rule of being a doctor is to not get too involved with your patients. However, some professionals are often taken by surprise when they see how successful their clients have been after any form of therapy. It is needless to say that this is just another stereotype that we see in our society that we do not see anywhere else.
Why is it okay for a girl to be a tomboy but not okay for a boy to be a sissy? I read a recent blogue entry on http://broadblogs.com/ that details some of the explanations that men are superior to women, although this has become reversed due to the sexual revolution, and the decrease of repression. Even animals of the nonhuman species have begun to change. Often when a guy does something sissy, the girls would be impressed, but the other guys would tease them. This was early seen in Shakespeare’s time when he wrote about romeo and Juliet. When gals do something that is more of a tomboy, the guys like it, but the other girls feel like they are being shoved aside. If this continued they would react in similar ways when the person becomes questioning or something of that sort. Many of us two-spirit people can dominate in either way because to us it doesn’t matter being which. We are usually considered easy-going in our childhood, conforming to whatever we are asked to do without really thinking about it. I am a blind and hard-of-hearing individual, so I could not really form an opinion on what it was I liked what I saw or things like that. I was raised Catholic, and from what I understand, Catholicism says one must be raised a certain way. Truth is, I could not form an opinion on that either because I was not really involved. But what I found intriguing was the desire, the wanting to console others, the yearning to nurture, the dream-like atmosphere I loved being exposed to, the feeling that I wanted to show off my skills and abilities to others, etc. It helps knowing that every human being has both a masculine and feminine side, although nonbinary people can also have neutral sides as well. I became very intuitive and very perceptive and
enjoyed describing things with gestures and with excellent word diction. Whenever I’d ask my friends to describe a particular sensation, many would say that it would be hard to explain. Two reasons for this is because they don’t have the right word choices or because they are afraid that the other person would not believe them. But I always loved describing things that seemed impossible to describe. One possible reason for a change in roles that we have noticed in two-spirit people is because they feel they are more mentally and emotionally dominant than being physically dominant. They start to realise this, and they move to another end of the spectrum. Here is my version of the spectrum. If you can imagine two number lines tacked to a board by two thumb tacks, with a belt running through them, on the bottom one can be one label, like M or F, and the same thing is on the top. Both number lines have numbers from 0 being on the left to 100 being on the right. If you move one of the labels on the spectrum to the right, the other one will move to the left. The same thing will happen if you take the other label and move it to the left, the other will move to the right. This is one of many ways of putting a binary together.
A number of science both hard and soft theories have been proposed and tested. An experiment that I would like to see conducted is to take a male newborn and nurture it the same way a female baby would be nurtured, and vice versa. What I would like to find out if this child development difference will somehow be of impact to a person’s assigned role. Many people believe that parenting has nothing to do with people choosing to become transgender during their childhood, or being nonconforming variant, etc. A science theory states that being transgender might have to do with how much hormone balances they have. As you know, women have a lesser count of testosterone within thirty to forty percent than men have of oestrogen, which would be only five to ten percent. This means that if men were to have higher oestrogen count that matched how much women had of testosterone, their personalities would be altered. This means, better brain hardwiring, more observation, higher intuition, etc that are usually associated with women. The truth is, there are just too huge a number of possibilities. But let’s assume that we had no attire, no roles for males and females. Let us just assume that we had neutral things. A person’s baby personality will usually tell you what kind of a person they may be in life. If a person is born calm and mellow without crying, it is most likely going to be female. This is just one of the many stereotypes that are found. And, when they grew older, their thought patterns can be observed. Next week I will talk about “The Giver”, in which everyone goes into sameness. That might help you understand what I mean.
Now, how and why has the gender binary created? Here is one possible explanation that will be explored once I list the primary and secondary sex characteristics of males and females. I might also list problems with intersex and the castrati.
Men: XY chromosome, testosterone 50+ percent, oestrogen 10- percent, facial hair, body fat distribution to a male appearance, hard skin and prominant veins, Adam’s apple and deep voice and resonance, larger bodies, increased muscle mass, sweat and odour production.
Women: XX chromosome, oestrogen 50+ percent, testosterone 30- percent, no facial hair (some may have higher testosterone count), body fat distribution to female appearance, softer skin and no prominant veins, no Adam’s apple is shown, higher voice and resonance, smaller bodies, less muscle mass, different sweat and odour production than men.
Bearing these characteristics in mind, the binary was created based on finding attire and roles that matched these universal characteristics, after which was prevaled to different places around the world. However, there is the exception where men have naturally feminine characteristics and women have naturally masculine characteristics. It doesn’t matter whether or not the person’s mind is in sync with their bodies. It is possible for a feminine man to act like a man, though he might have to adapt because of his lack in strength, power, etc that is usually associated with machismo. Same thing for women who look like men. Note that genetics in growth and sex hormones can differ as wel. These are the ones we choose to be known as queer. These people were the ones who were crossed. This meant that the men would be the ones who would wear feminine attire and use cosmetology. Some cultures have crossed stereotypes, where men and women have equal proportion to their body characteristics and who have the same morals taught, the same nurturing, etc. This might be why in some places men wear jewlry and stuff like that. These become neuroplasticised into the brain, another thing that science has overlooked. One good example I can think of is how something may feel natural. As you know, due to these characteristics, men and women walk differently, though there are always variants. It is just like being left-handed–you are born with it. But what if the infant were blind. How would they learn to walk? You would have to programme that into their brain.
One reason we are starting to see more and more campaigns here in the Western world is because our cultures and societies have begun to be very extreme, physically and otherwise. Everyone feels like they want to be better than everyone else instead of being at their best for themselves. We have campaigns about what words we want to put an end to, how to make them sound less hurtful, etc. The concept of freedom of speech has been interpreted as being able to say whatever you like. But now we are starting to find out that using abusive speech is like libel and slander. So what if freedom of speech became more of a will to say whatever you wanted to say without humiliating anyone? Suppose Congress started to look at these campaigns and said, what if we rewrote or amended the constitution about why these changes are occurring? Many people who are pessimistic simply say, it’s life and you should deal with it. Those of us who are optimistic and who are in the realm of what life was originally meant to be are the ones to be the changers, the revolutionists and humanists, etc. We do not follow the leaders, we do not go on impulse. The truth is, why has this even begun? Why could we not teach future children the proper way to use such things? Rudeness is something that we as humans understand from right and wrong. Rudeness calls for many sayings, gestures, etc, which anyone can do, but it will require the interpretation of another human to know what that means before it is considered to be rude. As a two-spirit, we are often sought for advice on how to improve monogamy among young people. This is because we are greatly valued since we have a leg in both worlds. In our world, marriages and relationships are often led by women, are ended by women, etc. Men are usually the ones to be given the silent treatment and are the ones who don’t figure them out. Two-spirits are the ones who hardly ever fail relationships. The truth is that women, since they seem to be the leaders, want men to be more like them, which many find very dissonant.
Now, let us continue with some of the traits found in male and female species. Has anyone really studied these around the world? I will be posting a few sources to back up my statement. How does desires in sexual activity, courtship, pair-bonding, afection, etc differ in males and females, in terms of the binary? Something we noticed was that desire in humans branched between what the mind said versus what their bodies said. In recent studies, science has seen that females were the leaders in attractivity to get males to turn on their reproductive systems and so that females can release pleasure found within the pleasure centre of the brain. This is where Oestrogen got its root word Estro. But let us suppose we could transmit this sensation from a female brain and send it to an MtoF brain. What would they learn from that transmission? Same thing with male brains sending their pleasure sensation to FtoM’s. One of the studies that was being worked on was by Daniel Bergner, along with a few other sources I was able to collect data and test them on suspected individuals. In a nutshell, men and women’s, and brains in between, are wired differently. Women tend to be more intuitive, multitasking, etc. Men can only do one thing at a time, and are not really aware of emotions. Plus, they cannot be sissy because it gives them a lot of dissonance, not the case with women being tomboys. This is why men easily get irritated when asked of such. Also, a new study is being proposed to change the balance of hormones by doing some gene therapy to see if we can turn a completely masculine or feminine brain into the opposite or neutral state, and the new genes would increase the connections and physically rewire the brain and modify the person’s body for men, while in women, their brains would grow and lose connections. This might be useful to replace current procedures found in hormone replacement therapy. Why should we use synthetic hormones when we could use the body as the host? This person would then be able to tell us if they have a feeling of newly-awakened desires or more awareness. But one thing that I was wondering, is it possible to genetically engineer an adul than it is to design a baby? It all comes down to mitosis and meiosis. Our bodies are constantly being replaced every seven or ten years. So, I am sure it can be done in adults. The gene for Progeria, which is an ageing disorder, has been identified, and scientists hope to do a lot more than just cure people with it. https://www.progeriaresearch.org/the-science-behind-progeria/
In our English language, men and women, and those in between, speak in very different ways. Same thing with perception, integration, and interaction (I/O.) I am not sure if this is innate, or if they learn it through developmental observation. Some people, like myself who have perfect pitch can pick up on this and make that distinction. It is suggested that people’s rewired brain within the central and peripheral nervous system traits are passed onto their offspring, which means that future people might be programmed with natural and modified interactions. A show that I was inspired can be found at the following url: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sunketempletrust/2013/06/25/the-two-spirits-connection-with-the-sacred-tree-of-life
Another characteristic that was introduced into the gender binary was that people with feminine characteristics were the ones to be more colourful, more ornate, etc than those with masculine appearances. If you think of this in terms of music, masculine music is very bold and stern while feminine music is soft and dream-like. Neutral things have either a combination of the two, or no combination at all.
And finally, I would like to find out if having any disability such as blindness, hearing impairment, or any physical and mental disability, etc will influence a person’s soma and psyche in the long run. Blind people are one exception. They are described to have higher intuition than either men, women, or nonbinary people combined, so they could be a different gender entirely. I am not sure how men and women’s visual field differ, but it is said that the latter tend to have wider fields of view than the former. This might be as a result from a hunting and gathering trait passed down from ancient times.
Below are sources that we used to analyse these data sets.
Source 1: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-157528/Do-men-women-speak-different-languages.html
Source 2: http://hplusmagazine.com/2010/11/28/total-gender-change-within-decade/
source 3: http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/TScauses.html
Source 4: http://www.genderspectrum.org/about/faq
Source 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geUJjwSBG-s&feature=em-subs_digest
Source 6: http://www.bilerico.com/2008/02/transgender_history_trans_expression_in.php
If a source link is broken or out of date, please let me know so I can change or remove it.
All research materials provided in this publication are to raise awareness to families, friends, educators, etc. The above material is a stepping stone for an introduction of new batteries for suspected people to undergo in the future. We should not focus so much on the obvious, but instead think about the possibilities. Commitment: If a volunteer chooses to partake of the research, they are encouraged to remain within communication. We are not learning much from them because they often withdraw and do not come back.

%d bloggers like this: